Tookmyskull's blog page, in response to your response to your last post, this is not a hateful thing at all but those things you pointed out that moffat did is weird b/c they started created/filming the show before the movie came out, they all went on a field trip to watch it. Also having irene adler work for moriarty is not something you would get sued over because it’s working within the canon and the portrayals of the moriarty/adler/holmes triangle really was very different. Don’t be upset w/me tho just commenting!

in response to your response to your last post, this is not a hateful thing at all but those things you pointed out that moffat did is weird b/c they started created/filming the show before the movie came out, they all went on a field trip to watch it. Also having irene adler work for moriarty is not something you would get sued over because it's working within the canon and the portrayals of the moriarty/adler/holmes triangle really was very different. Don't be upset w/me tho just commenting!

Anonymous

Oh…I know there really are no legal grounds there. It just made me sigh and roll my eyes that Irene was portrayed as working for Moriarty…AGAIN. And Irene is drugging Sherlock AGAIN, even though she already proved to be a BAMF by knocking out the “pesky American.” It would have been more fun for me if she and Sherlock had gone at it “mano y mano” without her resorting to an easy cliche like drugging him. I’d really like to see a moratorium on antagonists drugging Holmes, it’s done so often. And Moffat had plenty of time to see the first Sherlock Holmes movie, which came out in 2009, while the second season of Sherlock didn’t come out until this year. BTW, Irene Adler had nothing to do with Moriarty in Canon. He wasn’t even an element in that story. Thanks for your comments!